Reasons To Vote :: essays research papers

This exercise is rational because candidates must gain and maintain public support. The extensive be given that close to candidates go through requires enormous sums of money. This money is used to blend visible to the cud by the media. The media is responsible for linking the elites with the mass. This is why the elites use the media so more. The media portrays the candidates in a light that result get the most ratings. Candidates evanesce more money to help put a positive eddy or a higher approval rating on their campaign. Yet, this normally results in bad-mouthing another opponent. This, however, is not bad because the media is attracted by scandals, and they give most of their attention to scandals because that is what will attract the mass. The candidate acquires money from direct mailings and companionship affiliation. Direct mailings are frequently sent to members of large corporations who have large quantities of money at their disposal and who also would have a imperil in the outcome of an election. This interest group identifies in a air that if they give money to support a candidate, then once choose the candidate will return the favor and remember them by bread and butter a policy or other favor that would benefit that special interest group. A party affiliation is made by a candidate to give the public a recognizable symbol because of close to similarities between candidates. These similarities are a result of the candidates attempts to enjoy the mass. He/she will try to appeal to as wide array of ballotingrs as possible. The candidates will acquire a general platform, but will make sure that platform is wide enough that as many a(prenominal) people, or voters, as possible are able to hold it up.The mass reacts rationally. About 50% of the mass bothers to vote at all and usually less if it is not a presidential election. This is because they are so let down with the candidates as a result of negative advertisement campaigns, the depiction of candidates in media and their cookie-cutter policies. The mass cares more about economic security kind of than political involvement. Most people would just as soon vote for a candidate that has been around while the economy is doing well, rather than endangerment it by voting for someone who does not have all that much experience. They hear politicians who are for freedom of speech, free enterprise, etc and agree with these candidates.