Continuing Professional Development

proceed original culturewellnessc atomic number 18 masters use of the term touch schoolmaster tuition has evolved over the past decades from the narrower terms of go along alveolar reading (CDE) keep aesculapian exam gentility (CME), and continuing education (CE). Although these terms atomic number 18 still used interchangeably, the broader CPD, ac knowledges the inclusion of topics that extend beyond the handed-down scope of health c ar subjects such as managerial, personal and brotherly skills, and recognises the multidisciplinary condition of set and the wide range of competences enquireed to yield exalted quality patient cargon. It is the process by which healthc atomic number 18 superiors update themselves with the continuous acquisition of saucy knowledge, skills and attitudes that en satisfactory them to re main(prenominal) qualified, trustworthy and able to meet the ineluctably of their patients (Peck, McC all in all, McLaren and Rotem, 2000 ) and, their statutory bargains via their regulatory body (Mathewson and Rudkin, 2008). The underlying ism of CPD is to encourage womb-to-tomb development (Griscti and Jacono, 2006). It is essentially lifelong settleing in drill (Peck et al, 2000) that, post qualification and registration, now forms a continuum of cradle-to-grave quality self-reliance through with(predicate)out a professionals working life (Mathewson and Rudkin, 2008).The aim of this literary productions query is to support the causations dissertation which is an investigation into the possible shock absorber and effectualness of compulsory CPD on the professional competence of alveolar consonant cathexis professionals (DCPS), specifically, dental hygienists. The author is a qualified dental hygienist of 27 historic period and is included in the cohort of PCDs who complete their first five year cycle of CPD in July 2013.A literature search shew in truth few studies relating to dental hygienists and CPD therefore a vast absolute majority of training has been abstracted from literature pertaining to dentists and aligned healthcare professionals such as, doctors who in like manner undertake mandatory CPD. This appointment entrust refer to the applicable, generic outcomes from the literature un little the results are specific to a healthcare groupCPDa career long process mandatory by dentists to maintain, update and broaden their attitudes, knowledge and skills in a way that will bring the greatest benefit to their patientsEuropean Commission 1996 cited in Tseveenjav, 2003 Bailey, 2012.As a professional healthcare worker, CPD is alpha in that the quality of coif is dependent on the possession and proper use of high take aim skills, which, if non maintained may agree a serious impact or consequence for the patient (Collin, Van der Heijden and Lewis, 2012). Therefore, it is regarded as an estimable obligation and professional responsibility that practitioners engage in CPD (Murtomaa, 1984 cited in Tseveenjav, 2003) as it is an chief(prenominal) value of professionalism (Donen, 1998). Following a literature review, Hilton (2004) identifies six domains incorporated in spite of appearance ( medical checkup) professionalism, three of which are the personal or intrinsic attributes. These are ethical practice reflection and self-awareness responsibility and accountability for ones actions including a commitment to excellence, lifelong study and critical reasoning. Cosgrove (cited in Hilton, 2004) describes professionalism as a pass on not trait which must be maintained once acquired. The General dental consonant Council (GDC) concur and add that CPD, as part of professionalism, also lifts confidence in the practitioner and dental group (GDC Preparing for practice6). This is, however, applicable to all professionals who throw away a moral and social responsibility to remain competent and current in their subject specialism whether this is thro ugh legal compulsion or not. mandatory fellowship in CPDAs a response to environmental pressures (Johnson, 2008) such as advances in technology which have led to the corrosion of traditional (medical) boundaries (Pendleton, 1995) health sector reforms with a focus on streak (Johnson, 2008) and partly as a result of paradigm shifts in societal expectations demanding increased accountability (Tulinius and Holge-Hazleton, 2010 Mathewson and Rudkin, 2008 Tseveenjav, M, and Muttomaa, 2003) mandatory CPD was predated as a quality authorisation system to reassure the public that dental professionals are fit to practice and meet the standards required to stay registered with the GDCwithout which they cannot practice (Mathewson and Rudkin, 2008).In July 2008 the GDC, the dental regulatory body, introduced compulsory registration and mandatory continued professional development for all DCPs. The GDC specified that, indoors a five year cycle, each DCP should provide evidence of complian ce with the mandate and complete a legal borderline of 150 hours of CPD 50 hours of which must be verifiable by enfranchisement and include the core subjects of medical emergencies, disinfection and contamination, and radiography (GDC act professional Development for dental care professionals, 2012). The rationale, specific to healthcare professionals is that hard-hitting ordination maximises supportive health outcomes (Johnson, 2008). The purpose of professional regulation and mandatory CPD is twofold first of all to ensure the patients health, wel uttermoste and safety and, secondly to protect the public from reproach (Johnson, 2008).M either authors argue against mandatory CPD. Carpinto (1991, cited in Joyce and Cowman, 2007) felt that mandatory continuing education is at odds with the values and beliefs on which lifelong learning is based, cynically noting that it is targeted at those who to the lowest degree need it those who are already competent Donen (1998) observ ed that only attendance, not learning can be mandated and that CME needs will differ for individuals depending on what stage they have reached in their careers. Mandatory CE was considered ineffective and outdated in so much as the system only requires proof of CPD attendance but is not required to licence application to practice or competence and that it does not advance the quality of practice (Bilawka and Craig,20032). Additionally, mandatory CPD may, potentially devalue learning by affecting an individuals approach (Friedman and Phillips, 2004 cited in Sturrock and Lennie, 2009). The anaesthetists surveyed by Heath and Joness (1998) agree, commenting that it is often opinion of as bums on seats and ticking the box. Despite the evidence, regulatory bodies continue to use mandatory CPD as a means of quality assurance. forward to the introduction of mandatory CPD in the UK, Oosterbeek (cited in Bel field of operation, Morris, Bullock and Frame 2001) offered an story in favour o f mandatory CPD, which although not stated, may prove to be the overriding factor as to the enforcement of the mandatory model there is al more or less evidence that current provision of CPD may exacerbate disparities in supporter standards the highly skilled appear to volunteer for more CPD. Therefore domineering or prescribed CPD may compress these differentials and hence have a positive equity effect in ensuring uniform patient care. Furthermore, Hibbs (1989, cited in Sturrock and Lennie, 2009) suggest that, in the nursing profession, a small minority would not update their professional knowledge, either in testisly or formally, if CPD was not a mandatory requirement. Evidence suggests this minority exists across the professions (Firmstone et al, 2004, Schostak et al, 2010). It cannot, however, be assumed that non participation equates to practitioners not being competent or motivated (Griscti and Jacono, 2006).Another prop may, perhaps, be set in dexterity and litigation. The GDC prescribes three core subjects medical emergencies radiography, and disinfection and contamination. Shanley et al (cited in Barnes et al 2012) claim that most dental mistakes are made in these areas of competency. The author could find no further references or evidence in the GDC literature but from personal experience finds this an comprehendible and reasonable claim, and that a wider literature search will reveal more. Furthermore, in addition to specialist, update hangs, these areas are included in the list of most requested CPD topics at meetings (Barnes et al, 2012), suggesting that practitioners are aware that current practices in these areas are constantly changing and of their impact and consequences for all concerned. Therefore, it is understandable that the GDC reinforces these topics within the CPD cycle. Although, Cervero (2000) mention with caution that the trend across the professions in America, was the increasing use of CE as the foundation for re-licensur e when regulating professional practice with all state medical boards requiring annual accreditation of continuing education for recertification. The GDC will soon introduce this system, called Revalidation, for dentists and is currently in consultation over its introduction for DCPs.Scientific knowledge in dentistry is currently doubling every 5 yearsFlorida Academy of General Dentistry cited in Mattheos et al 2010Some studies assign that aft(prenominal) ten years, there is a steady decline in the current, applicable knowledge of a practitioner (van Leeuwen etal, 1995 Day et al, 1988 Ramsay et al, 1991 cited in Donen, 1998). some(prenominal) authors noted that practitioners tend to take CPD in topics of personal interest preferably than areas of deficiency or what might be deemed essential (Heath and Jones, 1998 Sibley et al cited in no(prenominal)man, Shannon, and Marrin, 2004 Sturrock and Lennie, 2009 Barnes et al, 2012). In a rapidly changing healthcare environment, this emp hasises the importance of healthcare workers remaining current as relevant knowledge and skills have a shelf life. Eagle (cited in Heath and Jones, 1998) defines the educational process as one which results in an alteration in behaviour that is persistent, predetermined and that has been gained through the learners acquisition of new psychomotor skills, knowledge or attitudes. Whilst Davis (cited in Cantillon and Jones, 1999) defines CME as any and all the ways by which doctors learn after formal completion of their training. act pro Development Intervention marrowiveness some(prenominal) studies explored the various methods of obtaining CPD and their effectiveness in changing clinical practice, post event. nearly were database and literature reviews, others used both qualitative and quantitative research data. every last(predicate) work is peer reviewed with the majority referencing and drawing from the authoritative work of Davis et al 1995, Changing Physician Performance A S ystematic Review of the act of Continuing medical preparation Strategies. Much of their work confirms and complements Davis et als main findings that galore(postnominal) CME interventions may alter physician performance and also, but to a lesser degree, healthcare outcomes. Concluding that these alterations are most often small, less often moderate and rarely large, adding, that CME interventions should be understood in the context of the delivery methods, nature and quality of the interaction and consideration be abandoned to the complex, individual variables such as needs assessment and barriers to change (Davis et al 1995).CPD activities range from the increasing use of the internet journals and study clubs lunch and learn events sponsored by commercial companies to regional and national conferences. Research, however, has shown that attendance at these events is normally due to personal interest rather than identification or a needs compend of a weakness in a grumpy area , and that some professionals may not even perceive any shortfall in their knowledge or practice (Hopcraft et al, 2010).The majority of papers reviewed are critical of the didactic, single event lecture. British consultant anaesthetists, surveyed by questionnaire, found that overall single event interventions such as didactic lectures were the least effective at eliciting change (Heath and Jones, 1998). Lectures were often criticised for their passive dissemination of tuition (Bilawka and Craig, 2003) with lecturers trying to impart too much information not passing enough time for questions and some attendees felt that they had not learnt anything new (Heath and Jones, 1998). Davis et al (1999) stated that didactic modality has little or no constituent to play. Contrary to Heath and Jones findings, Harrison and Hogg (2003) conducted a qualitative study which evaluated the reasons wherefore doctors attend traditional CME programmes. They carried out in-depth interviews, before an d after a course, and found resistance to the statement that traditional CME (lecture) does not change doctors behaviour, disagreeing, stating, they always learnt something new and were able to give concrete examples of their claims. The value of lectures may be that the information is broadly presented, thus enabling individuals to sift the information for that pearl of information relevant to their practice (Harrison and Hogg, 2003). This may explain the on-going popularity of the traditional lecture in that individuals attend because it does enable some form of up-date specialists or experts in their field of interest appears to be a draw, and possibly reassurance that their own practice is within current guidelines and thinking (Wiskott et al, 2000). Another dimension to the lecture is the cozy interaction with colleagues, where collegial learning takes place as experiences are compared. There is also a perceived relative cost benefit (Brown, Belfield and Field, 2002).Workshops and hands-on courses, learning through participation, have shown to be catalysts for change amongst dentists although they have a great associated cost they achieve a longer term impact on practice (Mercer et al cited in Bullock et al, 1999), which is sustainable (Mattheos et al, 2010). Interactive interventions such as journal clubs and small focused group discussions produced a greater effect than a single intervention (Mansouri and Lockyer, 2007).If used alone many CPD interventions have minor or negligible effect but when unite with other methods such as peer review, audit and feedback multifaceted interventions, may have a cumulative and significant effect (Oxman et al, 1995).there are no magic bullets for improving the quality of healthcare, but there are a wide range of interventions available that, if used appropriately, could lead to important improvements in professional practice and patient outcomes.Oxman et al, 1995The majority of studies concentrated on formal, plann ed structured programme, there was little evidence of research into the effectiveness of informal CPD and its application to practice, presumably due to difficulties in assessing impact and relying on self-reporting.responsibility for the effectiveness of CPD lies with the learnerEraut, 2001The effectiveness of CPD has been described, ideally, as the practitioner gaining improvements in practice through knowledge and skill and this improvement translates in to get around health outcomes for patients respectively. Although Belfield, et al (2001) state that it is very difficult to conduct controlled studies to demonstrate improvements in practice, or patient outcomes after educational activities and most benefits and changes to practice are self-reported with no independent verification (Eaton et al, 2011).The literature review shows that effective CPD has many so many potential aspects to be studied, but the majority of studies reviewed focused on the effectiveness of formal modes o f CPD, confirming Davies et als (1995) findings and in the main drawing the same conclusions. These conclusions, however, will be scrutinised further as tighter restrictions on CPD come into force through the introduction of Revalidation which will only turn out validated certification. This would seem to discard the value or impact of informal learning which seems at odds with the much referenced Davies et al (1995) description of CME as any and all the ways by which doctors learn after formal completion of their training. The systematic reviews have not drawn any firm conclusions on which intervention is the most effective stating that there is no single strategy effective in all settings (Donen 1998) due to the very many variables that impact of on the effectiveness of CPD. These areas be will be explored further in the authors research project. The last study relating specifically to alveolar consonant Hygienists was by Ross et al in 2005, who conducted a study of Scottish d ental hygienists, briefly touching on CPD. As yet there have been no studies into the effects of mandatory CPD and dental hygienists. The literature thus far has helped to formulate the research question What impact does mandatory Continuing Professional Development have an on the effectiveness of dental hygienists professional competency?ReferencesBarnes, E. Bullock, A.D. Bailey, S.E.R. Cowpe, J.G. Karahajarju-Suvanto. (2012). A review of continuing professional development for dentists in Europe, European daybook of Dental bringing up 16 (2012) 166-178.Belfield, C.R. Morris, Z.S. Bullock, A.D. Frame, J.W. (2001). The benefits and costs of continuing professional development (CDP) for command dental practice a discussion, European diary of Dental discipline 2001, 5 47-52.Bilawka, E. Craig, B.J. (2003). Quality Assurance in Health do by past, present and future (Part 1), International daybook of Dental hygienics 1, 2003 159-168.Bradshaw, A. (1998). Defining competency in nurs ing (part 2) an analytical review, Journal of clinical Nursing 1998 7 103-111.Brown, C.A. Belfield, C.R. Field, S.R. (2002). Cost effectiveness of continuing professional development in health care a critical review of the evidence, BMJ quite a little 324, 16 March 2002, 652-655.Carpinto (1991) cited in Joyce, P. Cowman, S. (2007). Continuing professional development investiture or expectation?, Journal of Nursing Management, 2007, 15, 626-633.Cervero, R. (2000). Trends and issues in Continuing Professional Education, New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, zero(prenominal) 86, Summer 2000, 3-12.Collin, K. Van der Heijden, B. Lewis P. (2012). Continuing professional development, International Journal of Training and Development, 163, 155-163.Cosgrove cited in Hilton, S. (2004). health check Professionalism how can we encourage it in our students?, The Clinical Teacher, December 2004, al-Quran 1, No. 2, 69-73.Davis, D. Thomson, M.A. Andrew, D. Oxman, M.D. Haynes, M.D. (1995). Changing Physician Performance A Systematic Review of the Effect of Continuing aesculapian Education Strategies,. JAMA, September 6, 1995 Vol 274, No 9.Davis, D. OBrien, M.A.T. Freemantle, N. Wolf, F.M. Mazmanian, P. Taylor-Vaisey, A. (1999). Impact of perfunctory Continuing Medical Education Do Conferences, Workshops, Rounds, and other Traditional Continuing Education Activities Change Physician Behaviour or Health Care Outcomes?, JAMA, September 1, 1999, Vol. 282, No. 9, 867-874.Davis cited in Cantillon, P. Jones, R. (1999). Does continuing medical education in general practice make a difference?, British Medical Journal, Volume 318, 8 May 1999, 1276-1279.Donen, N. (1998). No to mandatory continuing medical education, Yes to mandatory practice auditing and professional educational development, JAMC, 21 AVR. 1998 158 (8).Eagle cited in Heath, K.J. Jones, J.G. (1998). Experiences and attitudes of consultant and non-training grade anaesthetists to continuing medical educ ation (CME), Anaesthesia, 1998, 53, pp. 641-467.Epstein, R.M. Hundert, E.M. (2002). Defining and Assessing Professional Competence, JAMA, January 9, 2002, Volume 287, No. 2.Eraut, M. (2001). Do continuing professional development models promote one-dimensional learning?, Medical Education, 2001 35 8-11.European Commission (1996) cited in Tseveenjav, B. M, M. Murtomaa, V. Muromaa, H. (2003). Attendance at and self-perceived need for continuing education among Mongolian dentists, European Journal of Dental Education 2003 7 130-135.Fernadez, N. Dory, V. Ste-Marie, L-G. Chaput, M. Charlin, B. Boucher, A. (2012). Varying conceptions of competence an analysis of how health sciences educators define competence, Medical Education 2012 46 357-365.Firmstone, V.R. Bullock, A.D. Fielding, A. Frame, J.W. Gibson, C. Hall, J. (2004). The impact of course attendance on the practice of dentists, British Dental Journal, Volume 196 No. 12, June 26 2002.Florida Academy of General Dentistry cited in Mat theos, N. Schoonheim-Klein, M. Walmsley, A. D. Chapple, I. L.C. Innovative educational methods and technologies applicable to continuing professional development in periodontology, European Journal of Education 14 (Suppl 1) (2010) 43-52.GDC. (2012). Continuing professional development for dental care professionals. Available at http//www.gdc-uk.org/Newsandpublications/Publications/Publications/CPD%20for%20dental%20care%20professionals.pdfAccessed on 12 Oct 12.GDC. Preparing for practice Dental team learning outcomes for registration. Available at http//www.gdc-uk.org/Newsandpublications/Publications/Publications/GDC%20Learning%20Outcomes.pdfAccessed on 12 Oct 12.Griscti, O. Jacono, J. (2006). Effectiveness of continuing education programmes in nursing literature review, Integrative Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Journal Compilation. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. pp. 449-455.Harrison, C. Hogg, W. (2003). Why do doctors attend traditional CME events if they dont change what they d o in their surgeries? Evaluation of doctors reasons for attending a traditional CME programme. Medical Education 2003 37 884-888.Heath, K.J. Jones, J.G. (1998). Experiences and attitudes of consultant and non-training grade anaesthetists to continuing medical education (CME), Anaesthesia, 1998, 53, pp. 641-467.Hibbs (1989) cited in Sturrock, J.B.E. Lennie, S.C. (2009). Compulsory continuing professional development a questionnaire-based survey of the UK dietary profession, Journal of benignant Nutrition and Dietetics, 22, pp. 12-20.Hilton, S. (2004). Medical Professionalism how can we encourage it in our students?, The Clinical Teacher, December 2004, Volume 1, No. 2, 69-73.Hopcraft, M.S. Manton, D.J. Chong, P.L. Ko, G. Ong, P.Y.S. Sribalachandran, S. Wang, C-J. (2010). Participation in Continuing Professional Development by dental practiioners in Victoria, Australia in 2007, European journal of Dental Education 14 (2010) 227-234.Johnson,P.M. (2008). Dental hygiene regulation a gl obal perspective, International Journal of Dental Hygiene 6 2008 221-228.Mansouri, M. Lockyer, J. (2007). A Meta-Analysis of Continuing Medical Education Effectiveness, Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 27(1) 6-15.Mathewson, H. Rudkin, D. (2008). The GDC lifting the lid. Part 3 education, CPD and revalidation, British Dental Journal, Volume 205, No. 1, July 12 2008, 41-44.Mattheos, N. Schoonheim-Klein, M. Walmsley, A. D. Chapple, I. L.C. Innovative educational methods and technologies applicable to continuing professional development in periodontology, European Journal of Education 14 (Suppl 1) (2010) 43-52.Mercer et al cited in Bullock, A.D. Belfield, C.R. Butterfield, S. Ribbins, P.M. Frame, J.W. (1999). Continuing education courses in dentistry assessing impact, Medical Education 1999 33 484-488.Murtomaa (1984) cited in Tseveenjav, B. M, M. Murtomaa, V. Muromaa, H. (2003). Attendance at and self-perceived need for continuing education among Mongolian den tists, European Journal of Dental Education 2003 7 130-135.Oosterbeek cited in Belfield, C.R. Morris, Z.S. Bullock, A.D. Frame, J.W. (2001). The benefits and costs of continuing professional development (CDP) for general dental practice a discussion, European Journal of Dental Education 2001, 5 47-52.Oxman, A.D. Thomson, M.A. Davis. D. Haynes, B. (1995). No magic bullets A systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice, Canadian Medical Association Journal. November 15, 1995 153 (10), 1423-1431.Peck, C. McCall, M. McLaren, B. Rotem, T. (2000). Continuing medical education and continuing professional development international comparisons, BMJ 2000 320, 12 February 2000, 432-435.Pendleton, D. (1995). Professional development in general practice problems, puzzles and paradigms, British Journal of General Practice, July 1995, 377-381.Phillips (2004) cited in Sturrock, J.B.E. Lennie, S.C. (2009). Compulsory continuing professional development a question naire-based survey of the UK dietetic profession, Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 22, pp. 12-20.Ramsay et al (1991) cited in Donen, N. (1998). No to mandatory continuing medical education, Yes to mandatory practice auditing and professional educational development, JAMC, 21 AVR. 1998 158 (8).Robertson,K. (2005). Reflection in professional practice and education, Austrailian Family Physician Vol.34, No. 9, September 2005, 781-783.Shanley et al cited in Barnes, E. Bullock, A.D. Bailey, S.E.R. Cowpe, J.G. Karahajarju-Suvanto. (2012). A review of continuing professional development for dentists in Europe, European Journal of Dental Education 16 (2012) 166-178.Sibley et al cited in Norman, G.R. Shannon, S.I. Marrin, M.L. (2004). The need for needs assessment in continuing medical education, BMJ, Volume 328, 28 April 2004, 999-1001.Sturrock, J.B.E. Lennie, S.C. (2009). Compulsory continuing professional development a questionnaire-based survey of the UK dietetic profession, Jour nal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 22, pp. 12-20.Tseveenjav, B. M, M. Murtomaa, V. Muromaa, H. (2003). Attendance at and self-perceived need for continuing education among Mongolian dentists, European Journal of Dental Education 2003 7 130-135.Tulinius, C. Holge-Hazleton, B. (2010). Continuing professional development for general practitioners supporting the development of professionalism, Medical Education 2010 44 412-420.Wilson, N.H.F. Jones, M.L. Pine, C. Saunders, W.P. Seymour, R.A. (2008). Meeting Report Looking forward educating tomorrows dental team, European Journal of Dental Education, 12 (2008) 176-199.Wiskott, A. H.W. Borgis, Serge. Somoness, M. (2000). A continuing education programme for general practitioners, European Journal of Dental Education 2000 4 57-64.