Essay examples --

The Blind WatchmakerIn 1986, Richard Dawkins, an eminent ethologist and evolutionary biologist, create a three-hundred-plus page refutation of William Paleys followmaker likeness. The writing itself is thorough, elegant, and forceful. Dawkins possesses what is perchance the most blunt yet poetic scientific writing expressive style that exists, further abouttimes even quoting pieces of poetry and literature in his writings. While preliminary works such as The Selfish Gene and The Ancestors Tale were scientific masterpieces unto themselves, the insights contained in The Blind Watchmaker are among most of the most important and impressive ever offered by a pitying being. In writing this paper, it was difficult to decide exactly what to highlight the moderate itself is dense, although thats not necessarily a hindrance to its effectiveness. A costly place to start would probably be Paleys watchmaker analogy itself. To paraphrase, Paley asks you to imagine stubbing your toe in the middle of a grassy field. If you asked yourself how the stone pit got there, you might just assume it had always been there. However, if you were to stumble upon a watch in that same field, you would not assume the same. You would suppose that at some point in time, a watchmaker contriveed and created it for a purpose. Paley goes on to explain that every indication of contrivance, every manifestation of design, which existed in the watch, exists in the works of nature (Dawkins 5). To strengthen his argument, life is immensely more thickening than a watch. The crux of Paleys argument was the eye, and in his work earthy Theology he compares it to the man-made telescope. On its face, this appears to be a strong, vituperative argument against the natural appearance of life, but the analogy begins... ...rking on indiscriminately mutating, self-replicating creatures in order to create the variety and abundance of life on our planet is surely one of the greatest revelations mank ind has ever produced. interpersonal chemistry and physics alone are capable of colluding and eventually creating not just life, but sentience, intelligence - no divine nudge necessary. Thats not to say that this idea is entirely original to Dawkins (David Hume was capable of constructing an argument against design by only philosophizing), but that doesnt diminish the accomplishment this keep back represents. While many freethinkers out there disagree with his tactics and shape up as a proselytizing atheist, hes certainly earned a level of frustration. In The Blind Watchmaker, Dawkins has done all the footwork for us already. We necessitate only open its pages and utilize the relatively large brains that nature has attached us.