Ways Of Knowing More Likely To Lead Truth Philosophy Essay

Ways Of Knowing More Likely To overstep Truth Philosophy EssayTruth is a term that is multifaceted, and has been a popular topic of discussion by scholars and philosophers for thousands of geezerhood. Yet some extreme basics for something to considered true develop arisen after all the discussions and theories it must be a particular, is bonnyified in a way that that it corresponds to a fact that exists in the cosmea, matches with ones overall sets of belief and/or it is expendful and works in practice. A justified true belief is what is knowledge is composed of. mavin percept, reason, lecture and emotions be the intravenous feeding Ways of Knowing, each one a powerful gibe that enables us to reach closer the truth. Sense cognizance is the active selective and interpretative process of recording or bonny conscious of the external gentlemans gentleman reasoning is using logical, critical idea to establish knowledge emotion is the experience of a bodily answer to an event where we are aware and involved lastly, language is a as welll for communication and a system of persuasion and implication by means of with(predicate) the use of conventionalized signs, sound gestures or marks having understood meaning. However these four shipway of approaching the truth vary in that one may help yield much than precise answers and is more reliable than new(prenominal)s, depending on the their strengths and weaknesses. I believe that reason perception and reason creates a overabundant combination, carrying a high degree of proof, in discovering globose truths, compared to emotion and language, which are also critical but have greater limitations that provide challenges in geting the truth.Buddha once said, Do not believe in anything just now because it is spoken and rumored by many notwithstanding after observation and analysis, when you find anything that agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then stick o ut it and live up to it. This quote claims that perception, which is then behaveed by reason, is the ways most likely to lead to the truth, and I definitely agree. We experience the world and obtain channelize, immediate, constant information through our senses sight, hear, smell, touch, taste, movement, balance and huger/thirst etcetera The heading then processes these stimuli to create meaning to them and organize these sense data into schemas in our brain, reassembling reality to become organized, meaningful patterns, so that most of the clipping our world will be rational, steady and predictable. Hence we rely intemperately on sense perception as our primary source of data collection of our surroundings. In biology, for example, I did a lab testing the make of caffeine and adrenaline on the heart rate of transparent piddle fleas, called Daphnia. After exposing a daphnia in an adrenalin or caffeine solution, I relied solely on my sight to observe the thumping challenge of their heart beat and then count it. The heart beat dramatically increased from a 25 beats per second in controlled piddle fleas to around 44 in adrenaline and caffeine solution. By direct observation, my brain then gives meaning to this data input resulting in me, erudite the immediate cause of what consuming these chemicals does to a Daphnias heart. However sensational perception has a handful of limitations, the major ones including our biological and physiological limitation much(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) a incapability of seeing wavelengths outside the visible light spectrum our cognitive apparatus and processes raftt distinguish perception from illusion who we are as a knower, our built-in assumptions and prejudices alters the expectations and interpretations of situations- causing bias, subjective views sensory input is relative, thusly data from is s not always reasoned alone sensory input is also discontinuous and outdated. Conversely the invention of dig ital video, computing machine technology and modern technology helps fix these problems or even crush out it all altogether. For instance, when observance the figure skating world championships on TV, twain Mao Asada and Kim-Yuna skated dead, executing all their elements. My individuality- the fact that I favor and admire Maos skating style over Yunas, and my pity towards Mao for always win silver- contributed to my perception of the competition as being unfair when Yuna won gold. But when clips of the performances were previewed side by side, it illustrates how Mao did not fully finish her rotations on her triple jumps and thus was deducted points- ultimately justifying that Kim Yuna did deserve gold and performed a tidy program than Mao. This example proves technology can overcome major limitations such as filters and seeing what we want opposed to the reality, by justifying what we see with more scrutiny through technology since technology can record the world around us, p rovide instant replay and allow unbiased evaluation.On the new(prenominal) hand reason, is most advantageous collectible to its outcome of valid and coherent information- information with such a high degree of certainty that no other ways of knowing can reach. Reason assesses arguments, and provides support for claims and statements established through all the different experiments, studies etc. It is especially vital for areas with an empirical basis like science, history and math these areas have been so developed and consist of such reliable, coherent and corresponding theories delinquent to reason. Judgments and errors kick up the certainty of truth for other ways of knowing such as sense perception can be distorted language is too vague and ambiguous leading to multiple interpretations, and emotion is the least reason-based due to its unpredictable, instinctive nature. Logic controls the outcome of hardened conclusions with evidence. Yet reason has its flaws as well such a s the range of informal fallacies and when premises that compose the arguments might be valid the truthfulness is still questionable, hence other ways of knowing is required to justify it such as the reason of euthanasia where the argument Taking a life is morally wrong, euthanasia is the act of taking away a life, hence euthanasia is wrong. Is perfectly valid but the truthfulness must be enhanced through the use scientific observations like using technology to see if the persons brain is responding to stimuli.The use of sense perception and reason together complements each other to provide even sturdier, valid, reasoned-based knowledge with sufficient verification. The fact that global warm up is occurring is derived from both reason and perception. According to NASA 80% of ice field have been lost in the last century as see through satellite pictures, hence we can use deductive reasoning to think that if Drastic climate change and melting ice caps indicate global warming, NASA claims that 80% of ice field have melted , and United Nations Intergovernmental circuit board on Climate Change (IPCC) reports that 11 of the past 12 years are among the dozen warmest since 1850, hence global warming is occurringEmotions and Language has wind problems that override its benefits, and hence is less likely to lead to the truth. Although language is underlying in communication performing many functions such as transport emotions (expressive), express creativity, employ for social and representational purposes, it is deceptive and treacherous due to its vagueness and ambiguity.( Not so much for math and science, since language is controlled, neutral and rigid in these areas but in the other AOKs. Take Stalin for example, he used language as propaganda to establish a personal dictatorship, attack enemies and secrete the reign of terror and purges as well. Putting up slogans like Peasants can live like human beings filled with emotionally-arousing words, appealing c onnotations and glittering generalities manipulated the peasants into believe Stalin will bring back the glory days in Russia just like before World War I. Similarly emotion reinforces problems such as blurring reason, bias our perceptions and color our language humans are deep in thought(p) in controlling emotions- it is irrational and occurs at fluctuating, urgent impulses. For example when my suspensor and I watched Valentines Day, she had just broken up with her boyfriend so was sentiment distressed and gloomy, whereas I was joyous and excited to see Ashton Kutcher in it. By the end of the movie, her emotions has shaped a negative perception of the movie, thinking it was tatty and gay, and divert from rational thinking to blame me for wasting her time watching it. On the contrary sometimes our reasoning is based on emotion for example during a mandarin test, I had a swindle rag week ready in my pocket, but I decided not to cheat because of the guilt and fear I will feel. Suggesting that emotion mustnt be completely ignored since without emotion, the world will be dull, cause the uniformity of determine and everything will pass unnoticed. So emotions can help humans beat knowledge and enhance the search for knowledge, but the voice of reason is more rational.All the areas of knowledge are interconnected, one fails to work alone, and one effects the other, whether it is to enhance or limit the quest for truth. The advantageous combination of sense perception and reasoning creating highly valid, justified truths, with solvable limitations, whereas others, like emotions and language are overshadowed by its limitations.CitationsBuddha Buddhism Reality. On Truth and Reality. Web. Apr. 2010. .Mount Kilimanjaro Vanishing Icecaps. Scientific Visualizing Studio. 02 June 2002. Web. 30 Apr. 2010. .Global Warming Fast Facts. Daily Nature and Science word of honor and Headlines National Geographic News. Web. 03 May 2010. .Alchin, Nicholas. The Theory of Kno wledge.Heinemann, blue bookPowerpoints up on Moodle